Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jane Doe v. Amgen Inc.
as 2:2023cv07448
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Amgen Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Samuel May v. AMGN
as 23-16157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL SAMUEL J. MAY
Defendant / Appellee:
AMGEN INC., a Delaware corporation
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel
Kevin Wilcox v. Dearborn Insurance Company, et al
as 23-55484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN WILCOX
Defendant / Appellee:
DEARBORN INSURANCE COMPANY and AMGEN, INC. LIFE INSURANCE PLAN
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Onyx Therapeutics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv05326
Petitioner:
Sandoz Inc.
Defendant:
Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kevin Wilcox v. Dearborn Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv04605
Defendant:
Dearborn Insurance Company and Amgen Inc Life Insurance Plan
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
In Re In the Matter of the Ex Parte Application of Betapharm Arzneimittel GmbH
as 2:2021mc00894
In Re:
In the Matter of
Petitioner:
betapharm Arzneimittel GmbH
Respondent:
Amgen Inc.
Crandall Technologies LLC v. Amgen Inc.
as 2:2021cv01816
Defendant:
Amgen Inc.
Plaintiff:
Crandall Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
