Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Southall v. Hall
as 2:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Amos Southall
Respondent:
Phil Hall
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05341
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Amos v. Jordan et al
as 4:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Amos
Defendant:
Robert E. Jordan, Jayda Transport, LLC and Aegis Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Motor Vehicle
Clark v. Gordon County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Keith Amos Clark
Defendant:
Gordon County Jail and Mitch Raulston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Amos et al v. Hodge et al
as 5:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Kim Amos and Jack Amos
Defendant:
James C. Hodge and Lisa C. Hodge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HUBBARD v. LEE et al
as 5:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
AMOS HUBBARD
Defendant:
MAJOR A C LEE, CAPTAIN OBERSE, SERGEANT JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04199
Plaintiff:
Sarah Amos
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
