Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Theodore Luczak v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-2072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE LUCZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
ANABELLE MOTTELER, Assistant Warden, JANE DOE, Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer and others
Theodore Luczak v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-8010
Petitioner:
THEODORE LUCZAK
Respondent:
RANDY PFISTER, Chief Administrative Officer, JOY HENRY, ANABELLE MOTTELER and others
Dace v. Skeens et al
as 1:2015cv01138
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dace
Defendant:
Kristina Skeens, Salvador Godinez, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins et al v. Creech et al
as 1:2015cv01134
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Defendant:
K Prentice, C Creech, P Mcorinnis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Donelson v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DONELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, Warden, Pontiac Correctional Center, SUSAN PRENTICE, Lieutenant, Previously known as K. Prentice, PATRICK MCGINNIS, Lieutenant, Previously known as .McGinnis and others
Jordan v. Tilden et al
as 1:2015cv01028
Plaintiff:
Donald M Jordan
Defendant:
A. Tilden, Randy Pfister, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dace v. Pfister et al
as 1:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dace
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Marvin Reed, Michael Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Godinez et al
as 1:2014cv01441
Plaintiff:
Marco Henderson
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Gladyse Taylor, Adam Monreal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dace v. Quinn et al
as 1:2013cv01491
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dace
Defendant:
Pat Quinn, Lisa Madigan, S A Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Butler v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 10-2116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., EDDIE JONES, Warden, ANABELLE MOTTELER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
