Fair Labor Standards Act Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kwoka, et al v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Boston, LLC, et al
as 24-1126
Plaintiff: KYLE KWOKA, as representative of the opt-in plaintiffs for addressing the issues now on appeal, CAROLINA LOPEZ, as representative of the opt-in plaintiffs for addressing the issues now on appeal and MAMADOU ALPHA BAH, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals
Defendant: ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY OF BOSTON, LLC and ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC.
Owens, et al v. City of Malden
as 22-1674
Plaintiff / Appellee: JACK OWENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, JEFFREY DREES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, KATELYN MURPHY, on behalf of herslef and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant: MALDEN, MA
Matias-Rossello v. Epoch LLC, et al
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN OMAR MATIAS-ROSSELLO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: EPOCH LLC, FOT INVESTMENTS LLC, d/b/a Domino's Pizza and CLUTCH CONSULTING LLC
Ouadani v. TF Final Mile LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1583
Plaintiff - Appellee: DJAMEL OUADANI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: TF FINAL MILE LLC, f/k/a Dynamex Operations East, LLC
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit, et al v. MBTA
as 17-1494
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOCAL 589, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, And all others similarly situated, PATRICK F. HOGAN, And all others similarly situated, TIMOTHY C. BROWN, And all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit, et al v. MBTA
as 17-1443
Plaintiff - Appellee: LOCAL 589, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, And all others similarly situated, PATRICK F. HOGAN, And all others similarly situated, TIMOTHY C. BROWN, And all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant: MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Curtis, et al v. Contract or Mgmt. Service
as 16-2273
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROBERT CURTIS, on behalf of himself and all others situated and ROBERT LOWELL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
Hamilton, et al v. Partners Healthcare System Inc, et al
as 16-2088
Plaintiff - Appellant: DIANE HAMILTON, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated, LYNNE P. CUNNINGHAM, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated, CLAIRE KANE, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, INC., BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: YOUVILLE HOSPITAL & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., JAMES J. MONGAN, MD and DENNIS D. COLLING
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION
Hamilton, et al v. Partners Healthcare System Inc, et al
as 16-2087
Plaintiff - Appellant: DIANE HAMILTON, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated, LYNNE P. CUNNINGHAM, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated, CLAIRE KANE, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, INC., BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: YOUVILLE HOSPITAL & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., JAMES J. MONGAN, MD and DENNIS D. COLLING
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION
O'Connor, et al v. Oakhurst Dairy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1901
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN O'CONNOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, CHRISTOPHER O'CONNOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, JAMES ADAM COX, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: OAKHURST DAIRY and DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?