Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hebert v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00185
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Leah Meyers Hebert
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Corban v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Harriet Corban
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew Saul and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stuart et al v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brenda Stuart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Richard v. Saul et al
as 3:2020cv00804
Plaintiff:
Conrad Richard
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, Unknown Elkin, Lt. Col. Unknown Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sproles et al v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00777
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Bobby F. Sproles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clubb v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00767
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Clubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sibley v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00759
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff:
Stephen L Sibley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ross v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00629
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ross
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tiffith v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00617
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tiffith
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Yeager v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00619
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Nathan Yeager
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.