Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Roux v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00400
Plaintiff:
Nathan Andrew Roux
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Jarman v. Andrews et al
as 2:2018cv00966
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Jarman
Defendant:
Randy Lane Andrews, RLK Inc and K-N-K Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawson v. Martinez et al
as 2:2017cv02109
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Nugent Lawson
Defendant:
Nicholas Andrew Martinez and Service Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burrell et al v. Andrews Funeral Home, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00503
Plaintiff:
Marcia Burrell and Sherita Burrell
Defendant:
Andrews Funeral Home, LLC, Harriette Andrews-Douglas and Andrews Funeral Home
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Depuy Synthes Inc et al
as 7:2017cv01778
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, Johnson & Johnson International, Depuy Synthes Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jones and Willie Anthony Jones, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rahymes et al v. Andrews Transport of Texas, LP et al
as 1:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rahymes and Jabrittany Rahymes
Defendant:
Andrews Transport of Texas, LP and Andrews Transport, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Looney v. Purely, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
Kathy J. Looney
Defendant:
Purely, Inc., Andrew Khong, Kelly Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Griffin v. Clum et al
as 3:2016cv00601
Plaintiff:
Rick Griffin
Defendant:
Andrew Paul Clum and Wilson Truck Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Downs et al v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
as 1:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Jane Askew Downs and Andrew Jesse Downs
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliver v. Proctor (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 1:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
Malika S. Oliver
Defendant:
Donald Andrew Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
