Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Benjamin Woodhouse v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware Corporation and others
Floyd Harshman v. Ralph Beistline, et al
as 19-16693
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD A. PAEZ, ANDREW D. HURWITZ, RAYMOND C. FISHER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FLOYD EVERETT HARSHMAN
Daniel Dydzak v. Edward Chen, et al
as 18-15900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD M. CHEN, PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, PETER LIND SHAW and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Edward Chen, et al
as 18-15674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD M. CHEN, PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, PETER LIND SHAW and others
Sara Ybarra-Johnson, et al v. State of Arizona, et al
as 12-15974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARA YBARRA-JOHNSON, KARLA JOHNSON and ERICA JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, in its official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, in its official capacity, RHONDA CASH and others
Peter Palmer v. Kenton Jones, et al
as 11-18040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER MICHAEL PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTON D. JONES, in his official capacity as Yavapai County Superior Court Judge, ROBERT M. BRUTINEL, Administrative Law Judge, in his official capacity of Arizona Supreme Court Justice, JOHN PELANDER, in his official capacity of Arizona Supreme Court Justice and others
Peter Palmer v. Kenton Jones, et al
as 11-17544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER MICHAEL PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTON D. JONES, in his official capacity as Yavapai County Superior Court Judge, ROBERT M. BRUTINEL, Administrative Law Judge, in his official capacity of Arizona Supreme Court Justice, JOHN PELANDER, in his official capacity of Arizona Supreme Court Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
