Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hunter Douglas Inc. et al v. Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
as 3:2017cv01069
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas Inc. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hunter Douglas Inc. et al v. Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
as 1:2016cv01940
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas Inc. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hunter Douglas Inc. et al v. Budget Blinds LLC
as 1:2016cv01938
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas, Inc. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Budget Blinds LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hunter Douglas Inc. et al v. Nien Made Enterprise Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2016cv01316
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas Inc. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Nien Made Enterprise Co. Ltd., Norman International, Inc. , Richfield Window Coverings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Norman International, Inc. et al v. Hunter Douglas, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01002
Plaintiff:
Norman International, Inc. , Richfield Window Coverings, LLC , Nien Advanced Solutions and others
Defendant:
Hunter Douglas, Inc. , Hunter Douglas Window Fashions, Inc. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hunter Douglas, Inc. et al v. Nien Made Enterprise Co. Ltd. et al
as 2:2016cv01308
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust and Hunter Douglas, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Custom Commerce, Inc., International Window Treatments, Inc., Nien Advanced Solutions and others
Hunter Douglas, Inc. et al v. Nien Made Enterprise Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv01412
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas, Inc. , Russell L. Hinckley, Sr. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Nien Made Enterprise Co. Ltd., Norman International, Inc., Norman International Colorado, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
