Cases 61 - 70 of 112
Watson v. Annucci et al
as 2:2016cv06945
Defendant:
Anthony L. Annucci and Governor Andrew M. Cuomo
Plaintiff:
Steven Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeigler v. Annucci et al
as 1:2016cv09348
Plaintiff:
Synfu Zeigler
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, New York State Corrections and Community Supervision and Andrew M. Cuomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purdie v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2016cv09066
Plaintiff:
Sidney E. Purdie
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Anthony J. Annucci, Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campos v. Schneiderman et al
as 9:2016cv01313
Plaintiff:
John S. Campos
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Thomas B. Litsky, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2016cv00771
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Erie T. Schneiderman, Brian Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cuomo et al
as 6:2016cv06081
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Cesar A Perales, Anthony T. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Cesar A. Perales, Anthony T. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browne v. Hynes et al
as 1:2016cv00503
Plaintiff:
Kendall Browne
Defendant:
Hon. Andrew M. Cuomo, Charles J. Hynes, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagley v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2015cv01357
Plaintiff:
William Bagley
Defendant:
The State of New York, George Pataki, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagley v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2015cv08691
Plaintiff:
William Bagley
Defendant:
The State of New York, George Pataki, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
