Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ordonez v. Taylorsville City Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Sonia Ordonez
Defendant:
Taylorsville City Police Department, Scott Lloyd, Ethan Andrus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ion Solar et al v. Andrus et al
as 2:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Ion Solar and Solar Sales
Defendant:
Dallin Andrus, Dean Stemple, Andrew Curley and others
Counter Claimant:
Neal Damron and Brian Colaianni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Andrus v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Danielle Jean Andrus
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andrus v. Moala
as 2:2019cv00759
Defendant:
Toilose Moala
Plaintiff:
Brent Lloyd Andrus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andrus et al v. Zimmer et al
as 1:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Charlotte B. Andrus and Brent M. Andrus
Defendant:
Zimmer, Zimmer Holdings and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peterson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Peterson
Defendant:
Shawn Johnson and Doug Andrus Distributing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Rosario Lopez Rodriguez and Guadalupe Mierlas Urias
Defendant:
Shawn Johnson and Doug Andrus Distributing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harco National Insurance Company v. Andrus Transportation Services
as 2:2010cv00472
Plaintiff:
Harco National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Andrus Transportation Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
