Cases 71 - 80 of 488
USA v. Jose Angulo
as 22-1568
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE J. ANGULO
Baker et al v. Encon Industries Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv01842
Plaintiff:
Cordell Baker, Xavier Angulo and Owen Aviles
Defendant:
Encon Industries Corp. and Anthony Enrico Core
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Angulo v. Serrano
as 1:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Jose F Angulo and Jose Angulo
Defendant:
Nick Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv01531
Plaintiff:
Jose F Angulo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Angulo-Reyes v. Garland
as 22-486
Petitioner:
DERLING MARTIN ANGULO-REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Angulo v. Chubb National Insurance Company et al
as 4:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Angulo
Defendant:
Chubb National Insurance Company, Chubb Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas and Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ANGULO v. FIRST SERVICE RESIDENTIAL FLORIDA, INC.
as 1:2022cv20399
Plaintiff:
JULIO ANGULO
Defendant:
FIRST SERVICE RESIDENTIAL FLORIDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
AMAYA et al v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION et al
as 1:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
HECTOR AMAYA, ALEJANDRO ANGULO, JOHN GORDON BOYLE and others
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and TROY A. MILLER
Amicus Curiae:
GBS/CIDP FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL, INCS and IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATIONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
