Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. Chambers-Smith
as 1:2023cv01365
Petitioner:
Marlon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black and Director Annette Chambers-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Henderson et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Petitioner:
Martin Robinson
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Henderson, ODRC Director Annette Chamber Smith, Ohio Attorney Genera Mike Dewine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Misch v. Annette Chambers-Smith
as 3:2022cv01738
Petitioner:
Eric Misch
Respondent:
Annette Chambers-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Chambers-Smith
as 1:2021cv00324
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith
Plaintiff:
alexis ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Ohio Parole Board et al
as 1:2020cv02743
Respondent:
Warden Keith J. Foley, Annette Chambers-Smith and Ohio Parole Board
Petitioner:
Carl A Nelson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Ohio Parole Board et al
as 2:2020cv06283
Respondent:
Ohio Parole Board, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and Warden, Grafton Correction Institution
Petitioner:
Carl A. Nelson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Penland v. DeWine, et al.
as 1:2020cv00515
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Chae Harris and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Alex Penland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baisden v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2020cv01445
Respondent:
Governor Mike Dewine and Annette Chambers-Smith
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Baisden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jamison v. Smith
as 3:2019cv02834
Respondent:
Annette Chambers Smith
Petitioner:
Rickey Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sowell v. Fender et al
as 1:2019cv00998
Petitioner:
Marious Sowell
Respondent:
Mike DeWine, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and Warden Doug Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
