Cases 41 - 50 of 59
BECKER et al v. ANTHEM, INC.
as 1:2015cv00230
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HANK BECKER and JOHN L. MCAFFRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HARKER v. ANTHEM INC.
as 1:2015cv00223
Defendant:
ANTHEM INC.
Plaintiff:
JACOB HARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
CAHILL v. ANTHEM, INC.
as 1:2015cv00214
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CAHILL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
IMMERMAN et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00208
Defendant:
ANTHEM COMPANIES, INC. and ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
RICHARD IMMERMAN and BRIAN WEINSTOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
IFVERSEN v. ANTHEM INC.
as 1:2015cv00209
Defendant:
ANTHEM INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID IFVERSEN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BRESCIA v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Defendant:
ANTHEM COMPANIES, INC., ANTHEM, INC., DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
VALERIE BRESCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WEINBERGER v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00201
Defendant:
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM COMPANIES, INC., ANTHEM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. WEINBERGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LESHER et al v. ANTHEM INC.
as 1:2015cv00204
Defendant:
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY and ANTHEM INC.
Plaintiff:
VINCE KANDIS and COLLEEN LESHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
KASLOWITZ v. ANTHEM INC.
as 1:2015cv00188
Defendant:
ANTHEM INC.
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY KASLOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
GARSON v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00180
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC. and BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
