Cases 31 - 40 of 62
DUNG v. EMMEL et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
CHIEM MINH DUNG
Defendant:
ALISSA EMMEL, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv00082
Not Classified By Court:
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00083
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006 Review of Agency Decision
PARTEM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv03729
Plaintiff:
VERA PARTEM
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES and ANTHONY J. BLINKEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PEEVSKI et al v. YELLEN et al
as 1:2022cv02334
Plaintiff:
DELYAN SLAVCHEV PEEVSKI, INT LTD EEOD, INTRUST PLC EAD and others
Defendant:
JANET YELLEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, ANDREA M. GACKI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
