Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Anthony Jerdine v. FDC Miami Warden, et al
as 20-10351
Respondent / Appellee:
FDC MIAMI WARDEN, U.S. ATTORNEY and SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY JERDINE
Anthony Jerdine v. FDC Miami Warden, et al
as 20-10352
Respondent / Appellee:
FDC MIAMI WARDEN, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA and U.S. ATTORNEY, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY JERDINE
Jerdine v. Leonardi
as 1:2012cv01355
Petitioner:
Anthony Jerdine
Respondent:
David Leonardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jerdine v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv02436
Petitioner:
Anthony Jerdine
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jerdine v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2011cv01013
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerdine
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Stacy Gwin, Donna Cambiero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerdine v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00899
Petitioner:
Anthony Jerdine
Respondent:
United States of America and Cuyahoga County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jerdine v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00731
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerdine
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Park Assurance Company , Service Plus Mortgage, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jerdine v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerdine
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Park Assurance Company, Washington Mutual, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Anthony Jerdine, et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp
as 10-36097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JERDINE and DARRYL JERDINE
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
