Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Anthony Williams v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 20-15767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., successor-ininterest to U.S. AIRWAYS, INC. and AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., successor-in-interest to U.S. AIRWAYS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv08434
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Williams v. USDC-CASF
as 18-70640
:
In re: ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
U.S. AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Anthony Williams v. UAL, Inc., et al
as 13-15299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UAL, INC., GLENN F. TILTON, WILLIAM KING, (Ron) and others
Anthony Williams v. UAL, Inc., et al
as 12-16794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UAL, INC., GLENN F. TILTON, WILLIAM KING, (Ron) and others
Williams v. UAL, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03781
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Williams
Defendant:
UAL, Inc. , Glenn F. Tilton, William (Ron) King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Anthony Williams v. USDC-CAOAK
as 12-71100
:
In re: ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Williams v. United States Department of Labor
as 3:2011cv06653
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Williams
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. United States Department of Labor
as 4:2011cv06653
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Williams
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
