Cases 41 - 50 of 222
Kendricks v. Hugehs
as 1:2023cv01449
Petitioner:
Rickie Kendricks
Respondent:
Latoya Hugehs and Anthony Wills
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DALCOLLO v. FLORES et al
as 1:2023cv03713
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L. DALCOLLO
Defendant:
RAMERO FLORES, MARY FLORES and ANTHONY WILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Regan v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03886
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Regan
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Joshua Schoenbeck, C/O Lauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seats v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03876
Plaintiff:
Devin Seats
Defendant:
Anthony Wills and Menard Tact Team Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abuharba v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2023cv03834
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Abuharba
Defendant:
Nathan McCarthy, Joshua Schoenbeck, Anthony Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03826
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Morris v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03781
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Taylor, Tara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03775
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Wexford Health Source, Inc., Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Condon v. Wills
as 3:2023cv03747
Petitioner:
Andrew Condon
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haynes v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03512
Plaintiff:
Demond Haynes
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Anthony B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
