Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America v. Montejano
as 24-1649
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTONIO RANGEL MONTEJANO
Rangel v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jesus Antonio Rangel
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Valdez Medina v. Rangel
as 3:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Abraham Omar Valdez Medina
Defendant:
Jose Antonio Rangel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
RANGEL JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39906
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANTONIO RANGEL JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rangel v. MSC ESTHI et al
as 4:2021cv00961
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Rangel
Defendant:
MSC MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO., MSC ESTHI, RAPHAEL SHIPPING CO., LTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
INCORRECTLY FILED
as 7:2018cv00202
Defendant:
Juan Antonio Rangel Acosta, Daniel S Graves and Transportes De Carga FEMA, S.A. de C.V.
Plaintiff:
Sandra Graves and INCORRECTLY FILED
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Graves et al v. Transportes De Carga FEMA, S.A. de C.V. et al
as 5:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Graves, Sandra Graves and Sandra L Graves
Defendant:
Juan Antonio Rangel Acosta and Transportes De Carga FEMA, S.A. de C.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rangel v. Colvin
as 1:2016at01033
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rangel
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rangel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv01895
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rangel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alvirde et al v. Fresh Farms International Market, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00715
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Alvirde , Jose Eduardo Alvirde , Octavio Oviedo and others
Defendant:
Fresh Farms International Market, Inc., Dean Svigos and Mike Svigos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
