Cases 161 - 170 of 242
In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2011cv06714
Plaintiff:
Robert Pepper , Stephen H. Schwartz , Edward W. Hayter and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Nolan v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv06647
Plaintiff:
Amy D. Nolan
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Hachette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Medine v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv06178
Plaintiff:
Peter Medine and Dao Phong
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc, AT&T, Inc. and Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horowitz v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05538
Plaintiff:
Susan Horowitz
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Hatchette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rivers v. MacMillan et al
as 3:2011cv05080
Plaintiff:
Steven Rivers
Defendant:
MacMillan, Simon & Schuster, Hachette Book Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Miller et al v. Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05019
Plaintiff:
Chad Miller and Grace Hoke
Defendant:
Hachette Book Group, Inc., Harper Collins Publishers, Inc. , Macmillan Publishers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Key v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv04754
Plaintiff:
Katrina Key
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Kevin Burwick et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv04556
Plaintiff:
Kevin Burwick and Heather Kimbrel
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. , Pandora Media, Inc. , Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burke et al v. Apple Inc et al
as 5:2011cv04554
Plaintiff:
Marcia Burke and William C Burke, III
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Pandora Media Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burke et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv04555
Plaintiff:
Hillary Burke and Tommy Yarbrough
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Pandora Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.