Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Liewald v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07566
Plaintiff:
Sabine Liewald
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Computers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Blagman v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05453
Plaintiff:
Norman Blagman
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Amazon.Com, Inc., Google Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Alexander v. Murdoch
as 11-4291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Alexander
Defendant:
News Corporation, Inc., a corporation and ABC, Inc., and Affiliates, wholly owned Subsidiary of The Walt Disney Co., Inc., a corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Keith Rupert Murdoch, Officer, owner New Corportion, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., wholly owned subsidiary of News Corp, Inc. a corporation and others
Apple Inc. et al v. Dollisme
as 3:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc. , Adobe Systems Incorporated , Autodesk, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Edy Jean Dollisme
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Battino v. Samba Studios, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv07862
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Battino
Defendant:
Samba Studios, LLC, Mario Bosch, Apple Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Alexander v. Murdoch et al
as 1:2010cv05613
Plaintiff:
Martin Alexander
Defendant:
Keith Rupert Murdoch , News Corporation, Inc. , Disney Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Psihoyos v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07960
Plaintiff:
Louis P. Psihoyos
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Computers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Psihoyos v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07315
Plaintiff:
Louis P. Psihoyos
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Computers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Reinhardt v. Wal-mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv08233
Plaintiff:
Richard Reinhardt
Defendant:
Wal-mart Stores, Inc., Apple, Inc., RealNetworks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
