Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Hill v. Waters et al
as 2:2017cv00532
Defendant:
Adams, Waters, Apple iTunes and others
Plaintiff:
John Hill
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hospital Authority of Baxley et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op46157
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Appling County and Hospital Authority of Baxley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singapore Asahi Chemical & Solder Industries PTE Ltd v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2018cv01662
Plaintiff:
Singapore Asahi Chemical & Solder Industries PTE Ltd
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Trois v. Apple Tree Auction Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00688
Defendant:
Apple Tree Auction Center, Inc. and Samuel Schnaidt
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Trois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donahoe v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00763
Plaintiff:
Carter Donahoe
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Stefanou et al v. Apple Inc
as 1:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Lauri Stefanou , Jarrod Byer and Carly Byer
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zander v. AMResorts, L.P. et al
as 1:2017cv02673
Plaintiff:
Lori Zander
Defendant:
AMResorts, L.P., AMR GP Holdings, LLC, AM Resorts, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
APPLE v. AGRIUM U.S., INC. et al
as 3:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
RANDY APPLE
Defendant:
AGRIUM U.S., INC., CROP PRODUCTION SVCS., INC. and AGRIUM U.S. INC./CROP PRODUCTION SVCS., INC.'S BENEFITS (SEVERANCE) PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
APPLE v. AGRIUM U.S., INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00547
Plaintiff:
RANDY APPLE
Defendant:
AGRIUM U.S., INC., CROP PRODUCTION SVCS., INC. and AGRIUM U.S. INC./CROP PRODUCTION SVCS., INC.'S BENEFITS (SEVERANCE) PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
