Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Tipton et al v. Aramark Services Inc
as 3:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Ida Michelle Tipton and Heith Cornell Mayes
Defendant:
Aramark Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Robles v. L3Harris Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Rafael Robles
Defendant:
L3Harris Technologies, Inc., L3 Technologies, Inc., Aramark Services, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wright v. Putman et al
as 3:2021cv02074
Plaintiff:
Sue Wright
Defendant:
Katherine Putman, Aramark Food Service of Texas, LLC and Aramark Food and Support Services
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Tahri v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv04417
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Tahri
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martina v. ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 5:2018cv00014
Defendant:
ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC and ALBERTSONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lynn Martina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ware v. Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC
as 4:2017cv01918
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ware
Defendant:
Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garza v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00240
Plaintiff:
Miguel Garza
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00397
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Wilson
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. ARAMARK Services, Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander
Defendant:
ARAMARK Services, Inc and Nabors Offshore Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02522
Plaintiff:
Dionne Washington
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
