Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Lilly v. ARAMARK Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv17591
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lilly
Defendant:
Transocean Offshore Ventures, Inc., Transocean Offshore USA, Inc. and ARAMARK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Garza v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 1:2016cv00240
Plaintiff:
Miguel Garza
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00397
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Wilson
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. ARAMARK Services, Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander
Defendant:
ARAMARK Services, Inc and Nabors Offshore Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daigre v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv02343
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC , William Weinberg, Jeffrey Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Daigre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williamson v. ARAMARK Schools Facilities, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00118
Defendant:
ARAMARK Schools Facilities, LLC and Bridget Jones
Plaintiff:
Ellen Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williamson et al v. ARAMARK Schools Facilities, LLC
as 3:2016cv00117
Defendant:
ARAMARK Schools Facilities, LLC
Plaintiff:
Aramark Management Services, LP, Bridget Jones and Ellen Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Daigre v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01025
Plaintiff:
Sarah Daigre
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC , William Weinberg, Jeffrey Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Aramark Educational Services LLC
as 3:2016cv00003
Defendant:
Aramark Educational Services L L C
Plaintiff:
Thomasina White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02522
Plaintiff:
Dionne Washington
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
