Cases 11 - 20 of 68
McCarty (ID 6010350) v. Aramark
as 5:2022cv03025
Plaintiff:
Edrick Ladon McCarty
Defendant:
Aramark and El Dorado Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2021cv03269
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, M. Fellig, B. Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Aramark et al
as 5:2021cv03282
Plaintiff:
DeVonta B. Miller
Defendant:
Aramark and Shawnee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03204
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader and Craig James Strader
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sam A. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell (ID 6010477) v. Hitchcock et al
as 5:2021cv03092
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Evan Hitchcock, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2021cv03106
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Fellig, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Hitchcock et al
as 2:2021cv02141
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Evan Hitchcock, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas (ID 0103796) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03050
Defendant:
(fnu) Ravira, Kansas, State of, Aramark and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cody Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidwell v. Shirmekas et al
as 5:2020cv03239
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Kidwell
Defendant:
Aramark, (fnu) Shirmekas and Johnson County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee (ID 113662) v. Aramark
as 5:2020cv03202
Defendant:
Aramark
Plaintiff:
Antonio Alexander McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
