Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Arizona Public Service Company et al
as 1:2015cv00537
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arizona Public Service Company, Southern California Edison Company, El Paso Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
WildEarth Guardians v. EPA, et al
as 13-9524
Petitioner:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and ROBERT PERCIASEPE, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor - Intervenor:
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
Dine Citizens Against Ruining our Environment et al v. Arizona Public Service Company et al
as 1:2011cv00889
Plaintiff:
Dine Citizens Against Ruining our Environment , To' Nizhoni Ani , Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Arizona Public Service Company, Southern California Edison, El Paso Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Dine Citizens Against Ruining, et al v. Klein, et al
as 11-1004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT and SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE
Defendant:
AL KLEIN, in his official capacity as Western Regional Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Denver, Colorado and OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Interior
Intervenor:
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
Intervenor - Appellant:
BHP NAVAJO COAL COMPANY
Arizona Public Service Co. v. EPA
as 07-9546
Not A Party In Lower Court - Petitioner:
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
Not A Party In Lower Court - Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Not A Party In Lower Court - Intervenor:
SIERRA CLUB, DINE CARE, DINE FOR THE C-AQUIFER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
