Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dylan Brandt, et al v. Tim Griffin, et al
as 23-2681
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dylan Brandt, by and through his mother Joanna Brandt, Joanna Brandt, Sabrina Jennen, by and through her parents Lacey and Aaron Jennen and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Tim Griffin, in his official capacity as the Arkansas Attorney General, Amy E. Embry, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Michael J. Birrer, in official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Dylan Brandt, et al v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 21-2875
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dylan Brandt, by and through his mother Joanna Brandt, Joanna Brandt, Sabrina Jennen, by and through her parents Lacey and Aaron Jennen and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Leslie Rutledge, in her official capacity as the Arkansas Attorney General, Amy E. Embry, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Sylvia D. Simon, in official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Little Rock Fam Planning Svcs, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-2857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, on behalf of itself and its patients, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, on behalf of itself and its patients, doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Janet R. Cathey, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant:
Larry Jegley, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pulaski County, Sylvia D. Simon, M.D. in her official capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, M.D., in his official capacity as officer/member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Frederick Hopkins, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-1068
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Riddell, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Dwayne Daniels, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Brian T. Hyatt, M.D., Officer and Member of the State Medical Board and others
Defendant:
Bob Cogburn, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, John B. Weiss, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, Steven L. Cathey, M.D., Chair of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Inc. and Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
In Re: Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 20-1791
Petitioner:
State of Tennessee, State of Kentucky, Marie Holder, in her official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Little Rock Fam. Planning Svcs, et al v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 19-2690
Defendant / Appellant:
William L. Rutledge, M.D., in his offical capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Timothy C. Paden, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tom Tvedten, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, Stephanie Ho, MD, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients, Little Rock Family Planning Services and others
Louis Edwards, et al v. Joseph Beck, et al
as 14-1891
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Louis Jerry Edwards, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients and Tom Tvedten, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients
Defendant - Appellant:
Joseph M. Beck, M.D., President of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and his successors in office, in their official capacity, Omar Atiq, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and his successors in office, in their official capacity, Harold B. Betton, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and his successors in office, in their official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
