Cases 1 - 10 of 17
KE ARMS LLC v. GWACS Armory LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Jud Gudgel, Unknown Parties, GWACS Defense Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
KE ARMS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GWACS Armory, LLC v. KE Arms, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00341
Defendant:
Shawn Nealon, Brownells, Inc., KE Arms, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GWACS Armory, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. Armed Forces Benefit Association et al
as 5:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Laura Daniel
Defendant:
Armed Forces Benefit Association and 5 Star Life Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arlington Arms LLC v. Houston Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 5:2015cv00702
Plaintiff:
Arlington Arms LLC
Defendant:
Houston Specialty Insurance Company and Derek O'Daniell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armed Forces Benefit Association v. Lefrandt
as 2:2015cv00358
Plaintiff:
Armed Forces Benefit Association
Defendant:
Joye S. Lefrandt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cherry v. Remington Arms Company, et al
as 12-6303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC. and SPORTING GOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
McCormick v. Remington Arms, et al
as 12-6304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY T. MCCORMICK, individually and as class representative
Defendant - Appellee:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC. and SPORTING GOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
Braxton v. Armed Forces Bank, N.A.
as 2:2012cv02666
Plaintiff:
Damita Braxton
Defendant:
Armed Forces Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Armed Forces Insurance Exchange v. Insurance Data Processing, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02543
Plaintiff:
Armed Forces Insurance Exchange
Defendant:
Insurance Data Processing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCormick et al v. Remington Arms Company Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T McCormick
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company Inc and Sporting Goods Properties Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
