Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Qualcomm Incorporated et al v. ARM Holdings PLC
as 1:2024cv00490
Defendant:
ARM Holdings PLC and ARM LTD.
Plaintiff:
Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bowser v. Nazario et al
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Shaqueal E. Bowser
Defendant:
Antionne D. Nazario, Kimberly A. Lopez, Keith Baumann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arm Ltd. v. Qualcomm Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01146
Counter Defendant:
Arm Ltd.
Counter Claimant:
Qualcomm Inc.
Defendant:
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and NuVia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez, Thomas Ash and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Carlisle v. Tenneco, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Defendant:
Tenneco, Inc., Roy V. Armes, Thomas C. Freyman and others
Bui v. Armes et al
as 1:2014cv01272
Plaintiff:
David Bui and Henry Zwang
Defendant:
Roy V. Armes , Bradley Hughes , Thomas P. Capo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fitzgerald v. Armes et al
as 1:2014cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jim Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Roy Armes, Bradley Hughes, R. W. Huber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
OFI Risk Arbitrages et al v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 1:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
OFI Risk Arbitrages , OFI Risk Arb Absolu and Timber Hill LLC
Defendant:
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company , Roy Armes and Bradley Hughes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Taser International Inc. v. Karbon Arms LLC
as 1:2011cv00426
Plaintiff:
Taser International Inc.
Defendant:
Karbon Arms LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
