Cases 1 - 10 of 6,644
United States of America v. ARMCO Steel Corp. et al
as 2:2019mc00107
Defendant:
Dresser Indus., Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co., Sargent Eng g Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
DUNCAN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86745
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUNCAN and JOHN DUNCAN
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCLENDON v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86755
Plaintiff:
MCNEAL MCLENDON and MCNEAL MCLENDON
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CLIPPARD, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86550
Plaintiff:
CLYDE RANDY CLIPPARD
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TERRY v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86776
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TERRY and BOBBY TERRY
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HUGHES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86449
Plaintiff:
STELLA OMEGA HUGHES
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SHOEMAKER, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86592
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAYMOND SHOEMAKER
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TAPLEY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86490
Plaintiff:
CARL TAPLEY
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SATTERFIELD, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86589
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WILSON SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BAGGS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86406
Plaintiff:
ALAN EUGENE BAGGS
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
