Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 11 - 20 of 44
ADCARE HOSPITAL OF WORCESTER, INC. et al v. WRIGHT
as 1:2017cv01896
Plaintiff: ADCARE HOSPITAL OF WORCESTER, INC. , ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK , ARIA HEALTH and others
Defendant: DONALD WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ARIA HEALTH et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01402
Plaintiff: ARIA HEALTH , ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK , ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02212
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01443
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMSTRONG v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00241
Defendant: WMATA
Plaintiff: FLORCEFIDA ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARMSTRONG v. AMTRAK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00440
Defendant: AMTRAK
Plaintiff: JOSEPH E. ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. SYLVIA BURWELL
as 1:2014cv01722
Plaintiff: ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , ADCARE HOSPITAL OF WORCESTER, INC. , ADVOCATE BROMENN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ARMSTRONG v. FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT STAFF et al
as 1:2014cv00993
Plaintiff: KENRICK ARMSTRONG
Defendant: FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT STAFF, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01765
Plaintiff: ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST GLENOAKS HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST HINSDALE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?