Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Armstrong v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2013cv05548
Plaintiff:
Bryan Armstrong
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2013cv05160
Plaintiff:
Bryan M. Armstrong
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and American Postal Workers Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Armstrong et al v. Smith, et al
as 1:2013cv02277
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rogers , Sy-Nai Rogers , Kiara Nicholson and others
Defendant:
Daniel Smith and City of Chicago
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kennedy et al v. Elyea et al
as 2:2012cv02155
Defendant:
Willard O Elyea, Michael Puisis and Louis Schicker
Plaintiff:
Andre Kennedy , Timothy Giancana , Paul McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc, Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Purnell v. City of Pontiac et al
as 1:2011cv01331
Defendant:
City of Pontiac , Markus Armstrong , Dan Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Helga Purnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Patient
as 2:2011cv02156
Plaintiff:
William A Armstrong
Defendant:
B W Patient, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
