Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Azael Dythian Perales v. Orange County Sheriffs Department et al
as 8:2011cv00824
Respondent:
Don Bankhead, Patricia C Bates, Ben S Bernanke and others
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Johnnie Hoze v. Ken Clark, et al
as 11-16243
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNIE HOZE
Respondent - Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden, BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
Danny Rosales v. California Board of Parole Hea, et al
as 11-16167
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNY SAUL ROSALES
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, THOMAS L. CAREY, Warden, California State Prison-Solano, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California and others
Richard Lewis v. M. Veal, et al
as 11-15882
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD J. LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
M. VEAL, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Zuri S Young v. State of California et al
as 5:2011cv00566
Respondent:
Matthew Cate, G. D. Lewis, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Petitioner:
Zuri S.K. Young
Antonio Ventura v. D. Sisto, et al
as 11-15662
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO VENTURA
Respondent - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, Warden and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor
Ronald Bratton v. Margarita Perez, et al
as 11-15618
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD BRATTON
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARITA PEREZ, Chairman-BOPH, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor and BEN CURRY
Emanuel Manning v. R. Grounds, et al
as 11-15543
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMANUEL MANNING
Respondent - Appellee:
R. GROUNDS, Warden and GOVERNOR ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
Balkam v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2011cv00383
Petitioner:
Matthew Balkam
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger and James Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Darryl Oak v. D. Sisto, et al
as 11-15499
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL OAK
Respondent - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, BOARD OF PRISON HEARINGS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
