Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Reynolds v. Arnone
as 19-2858
Defendant / Appellant:
Leo Arnone, Commissioner Connecticut Department of Corrections, Individual Capacity, Edward Maldonado, Warden N.C.I., Individual Capacity, Angel Quiros, Regional Warden N.C.I., Official and Individual Capacity and others
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Connecticut Department of Corrections, Official and Individual Capacity, John Doe, Connecticut Department of Corrections, Official and Individual Capacity and Jason Cahill, Captain at N.C.I., Official and Individual Capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Richard Reynolds
Edwards v. Arnone
as 19-753
Defendant:
Leo C. Arnone, Commissioner, Individual and Official Capacity and Boland, Grievance Coordinator, Individual and Official Capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
Melendez, C.O., Individual and Official Capacity and Dzrenda, Individual and Official Capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M.A. Edwards
Jenkins v. Arnone
as 14-1379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Benjamin Jenkins
Defendant - Appellee:
Peter Murphy, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, John/Jane Doe, Individual and Official Capacity and Leo Arnone, Commissioner of Correction, Individual and Official Capacity
Edwards v. Arnone
as 14-329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M.A. Edwards
Defendant:
Szaban
Defendant - Appellee:
Arnone, Commissioner, Official and Individual Capacity, LaJoie, Complex Warden, Official and Individual Capacity, Quiros, Warden, Official and Individual Capacity and others
Alston v. Cahill
as 12-4179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ira Alston
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Rodriquez, Correction Officer, I/O
Defendant - Appellee:
Cahill, Lieutenant, I/O, Saylor, Lieutenant, Diaz, Correction Officer, I/O and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3958
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2639
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
