Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Franklin v. Central Credit Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00381
Plaintiff:
Lionel Franklin and Lionel Franklin
Defendant:
Central Credit Services, Inc. and Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McAulliffe v. Arrow Financial Services LLC et al
as 1:2007cv06952
Plaintiff:
Charles E McAulliffe, Charles E McAulliffe and Charles E McAulliffe
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services LLC, Intelnet Global Services Ltd. and Intelanet America Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lansden v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2007cv05266
Plaintiff:
Hubert L. Lansden, Hubert L. Lansden and Hubert L. Lansden
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Randle v. Arrow Financial Services LLC
as 1:2007cv00191
Plaintiff:
Gary Randle
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McDowell v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv04053
Plaintiff:
Shawn McDowell, Shawn McDowell and Shawn McDowell
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC and Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gordon v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2007cv03230
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gordon, Kimberly Gordon and Kimberly Gordon
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Whitehead v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2007cv02012
Plaintiff:
Jeff Whitehead
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NASH v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.
as 1:2007cv00432
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. NASH, MICHAEL S. NASH, MICHAEL S. NASH and others
Defendant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
