Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Alan Vance Satterwhite v. Art.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06591
Defendant:
Art.com, Inc., DOES 1 to 10, and DOES 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Alan V Satterwhite
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mark Johnson v. Art.Com Inc et al
as 2:2017cv08976
Defendant:
Art.Com Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Knapp v. Art.com, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00768
Defendant:
Art.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Prescott Knapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DMCA Subpoena to Amazon.Com
as 3:2015mc80225
Petitioner:
Art.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pete Livingston v. Art.com, Inc., et al
as 14-16549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETE LIVINGSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ART.COM, INC. and CULTURENIK PUBLISHING, INC.
Defendant:
CLASSICO SAN FRANCISCO, INC.
Gotham City Online, LLC, et al v. Art.com, Inc.
as 14-16253
Plaintiff:
GOTHAM CITY ONLINE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Appellant:
BRAUNHAGEY & BORDEN, LLP, former counsel of Record for Gotham City Online, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
ART.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation
Gotham City Online, LLC, et al v. Art.com, Inc.
as 14-15538
Plaintiff:
GOTHAM CITY ONLINE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Appellant:
BRAUNHAGEY & BORDEN, LLP, former counsel of Record for Gotham City Online, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
ART.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation
Gotham City Online, LLC v. Art.com, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00991
Plaintiff:
Gotham City Online, LLC
Defendant:
Art.com, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
BraunHagey & Borden LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Livingston v. Art.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv03748
Plaintiff:
Pete Livingston
Defendant:
Art.com, Inc., Dream City Photo Lab, Jack Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Select Retrieval, LLC v. American Apparel, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv02158
Plaintiff:
Select Retrieval, LLC
Defendant:
American Apparel, LLC, Art.com, Inc., Autozone Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
