Cases 31 - 40 of 46
The Mississippi Bar v. Cotton
as 3:2020ad00001
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Ramel L. Cotton
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Tucker
as 3:2019ad00011
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Samuel L. Tucker
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Flechas
as 3:2019ad00010
Interested Party:
David C. Bramlette, III, Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander and others
Respondent:
Eduardo A. Flechas
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Gibbons
as 3:2019ad00009
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
David Cartan Loker Gibbons, Jr.
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Miller
as 3:2019ad00008
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Jonathan Adam Miller
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Mahan
as 3:2019ad00007
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Daniel Bradley Mahan
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Byrd
as 3:2019ad00006
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Sibyl Caver Byrd
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Johnson
as 3:2019ad00005
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Merry Caitlin Johnson
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Smith
as 3:2019ad00003
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Mark R. Smith
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Plunkett
as 3:2019ad00001
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Sharon G. Plunkett
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
