Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Argueta et al v. Pie Castle Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Carlos Argueta and Johana Alvarez
Defendant:
Pie Castle Inc., Arya Food Corp and Ahmet Ozel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Flanders et al v. Federal-Mogul Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00027
Defendant:
Federal-Mogul Corporation and Consumer Auto Parts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lisa Flanders , Arya Flanders and Shiva Flanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Federal Trade Commission v. Pecon Software Ltd et al
as 1:2012cv07186
Plaintiff:
ABC and Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
DEF, Pecon Software Ltd also d/b/a Pecon Software Services LLC, Pecon Services, Inc., Pecon Information Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Yah Raj Films (USA) Inc. v. Sur Sangeet Video Electronics Inc. et al
as 2:2009mc00060
Plaintiff:
Yah Raj Films (USA) Inc.
Defendant:
Sur Sangeet Video Electronics Inc., Mohammad Daud, Adeel Ahmed and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
SND Enterprises, LLC, Sewa Ram Arya and Daniel Winthrop
ThirdParty Defendant:
Viva Entertainment LLC, Dalip Adnani and John Does 1-5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Arya Shipping Lines PJS v. Four Winds Maritime SDN BHD et al
as 1:2007cv07037
Plaintiff:
Arya Shipping Lines PJS and Arya Shipping Lines PJS
Defendant:
Four Winds Maritime SDN BHD and IBETO Cement Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
