Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SCHNEBLE v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC) et al
as 2:2009cv62997
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCHNEBLE
Defendant:
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC), CONTINENTAL MARITIME INDUSTRIES INC., CONTINENTAL MARITIME INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARCELINE et al v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC) et al
as 2:2009cv62894
Plaintiff:
REBECCA MARCELINE, REBECCA MARCELINE, DONALD WEBB and others
Defendant:
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC), ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC), WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARCELINE et al v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC) et al
as CAN/3:99-CV-03258
Plaintiff:
MARCELINE
Defendant:
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC)
William Andrews v. Asbestos Defendants (BHC), et al.
as CAN/3:02-CV-05351
Defendant:
Asbestos Defendants (BHC)
Plaintiff:
William Andrews
Edward Meyer v. Asbestos Defendants (BHC), et al.
as CAN/3:02-CV-02843
Plaintiff:
Edward Meyer
Defendant:
Asbestos Defendants (BHC)
Charles Schneble v. Asbestos Defendants (BHC), et al.
as CAN/4:01-CV-03349
Defendant:
Asbestos Defendants (BHC)
Plaintiff:
Charles Schneble
Schneble v. Asbestos defendants (BHC) et al
as 4:2001cv03349
Plaintiff:
Charles Schneble
Defendant:
Asbestos defendants (BHC) , Continental Maritime Industries Inc , The Anchor Packing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marceline, et al v. Asbestos Defendants, et al
as 3:1999cv03258
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Marceline , Donald Webb , Jack Webb and others
Defendant:
Asbestos Defendants (BHC) and Waterman Steamship Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Miller v. Asbestos Defendants, et al
as 3:1998cv03282
Plaintiff:
Ervin Miller and Bank of America NA & SA
Defendant:
Asbestos Defendants (BHC), Aqua-Chem, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
