Cases 21 - 30 of 65
ATKINS v. GODISH
as 2:2020cv13161
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE L. ATKINS
Defendant:
LAREE A. L. GODISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv11732
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC)
Plaintiff:
KAYE ATKINS and THE ESTATE OF FAYE MCDONALD
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv19450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv19245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv16979
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
ATKINS v. CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2019cv13886
Defendant:
BRIAN BLEISTEIN, DR. DEFILLIPPES, DR. SHAETER and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE PATRICE ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv09360
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A. INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Plaintiff:
FLOYD ATKINS
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv08810
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CIARA ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
