Cases 1 - 10 of 2,987
Michael Romig v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. ROMIG
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Wayne Davis v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1858
Plaintiff:
WAYNE A. DAVIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAIR COUNTY
Abdush Dubose, et al v. Attorney General United States of America, et al
as 24-1815
Plaintiff:
ABDUSH DUBOSE, ZUMAR DUBOSE and KARIEM BASEER DUBOSE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Kathleen Dorsett v. Warden New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1881
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. DORSETT
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Kaitlyn Cooper Youmans v. Warden SCI Muncy, et al
as 24-1859
Plaintiff:
KAITLYN COOPER YOUMANS
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI MUNCY and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Matthew Milisits v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CHRISTIAN MILISITS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Ricky Miller, Jr. v. Warden Greene SCI, et al
as 24-1837
Plaintiff:
RICKY L. MILLER, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN GREENE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Dwayne Hill, Jr. v. Warden SCI Brenner, et al
as 24-1829
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HILL, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI BRENNER, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jermaine Vaughn v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1822
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE VAUGHN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Charles Jones v. Jerry Hobeck, et al
as 24-1802
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
JERRY HOBECK, Police Officer, JUDITH P. PETRUSH, District Attorney and FRANK PALLONE, JR., Magisterial District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
