Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Boyd v. Norfolk General District Court Traffic Division, Criminal Division, Civil Division, JUVENILE COURT et al
as 2:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dorarena Boyd
Defendant:
Norfolk General District Court Traffic Division, Criminal Division, Civil Division, JUVENILE COURT, Departmentof Motor Vehicle Law Enforcement, POLICE DEPARTMENT INTERNAL AFFAIRS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilmore v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00017
Defendant:
Infowars, LLC, Lee Stranahan, Scott Creighton and others
Plaintiff:
Brennan M. Gilmore
Amicus Curiae:
Veronique de la Rosa, Neil Heslin, Civil Procedure Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Alfred S Thomas, Jr., City of Charlottesville, Attorney Joseph D. Platania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Shipman v. Attorney General Of The United States et al
as 1:2017cv01058
Plaintiff:
Calvin V. Shipman
Defendant:
Attorney General Of The United States and United States Attorney For The Eastern District of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trantham v. Henry County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2010cv00058
Defendant:
Commonwealth Attorney (County of Henry), Drug Enforcement Agency, Gardner Gardner Barrow & Sharpe and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Trantham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Fauber v. Commonwealth: Christy Monolo et al
as 5:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J. Fauber
Defendant:
Commonwealth: Christy Monolo and Attorney General's Office/Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
