Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hoops Corporation et al v. Secretary, U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2024cv20882
Plaintiff:
Hoops Corporation and Angela Di Porzio
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
ASUAJE v. MAYORKAS et al
as 9:2024cv80230
Plaintiff:
Guillermo J ASUAJE
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, DISTRICT DIRECTOR BRETT K RINEHART and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Francois v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv20669
Plaintiff:
Sonel Francois
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20374
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
