Cases 41 - 50 of 289
Shaw (ID 07400) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03160
Petitioner:
Dennis Eugene Shaw
Respondent:
Doug Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03145
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dougherty v. Attorney General of Kansas
as 5:2015cv03131
Petitioner:
Beau Jay Dougherty
Respondent:
Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elnicki v. State of Kansas, et al
as 15-3128
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAURANCE L. ELNICKI
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS and REX PRYOR
Pruitt v. Heimgartner, et al
as 15-3118
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD JOEL PRUITT
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility, MARY NELSON, Deputy Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility SEU and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
James (ID 77522) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03116
Petitioner:
Tyron James
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Shawnee County District Attorney et al
as 5:2015cv03095
Petitioner:
Ervin Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
Shawnee County District Attorney, Topeka Police Department and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dougherty v. Attorney General of Kansas
as 5:2015cv03094
Petitioner:
Beau Jay Dougherty
Respondent:
Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03074
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hughes (ID 96576) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2015cv03076
Petitioner:
Charley Hughes
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
