Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 130
Cromwell v. Wise et al
as 2:2010cv01480
Petitioner: Harrison Cromwell
Respondent: David Wise and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2010cv01287
Petitioner: Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent: Hetzel and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sebastian v. City of Huntsville Alabama et al
as 5:2010cv01266
Petitioner: Edward Paul Sebastian
Respondent: City of Huntsville Alabama and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKubbin v. Rathman et al
as 1:2010cv01207
Petitioner: Jackie McKubbin
Respondent: John Rathman and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Houston v. Patterson et al
as 5:2010cv01120
Petitioner: Vic Demone Houston
Respondent: Tony Patterson and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2010cv01068
Petitioner: Darrow Bernard Payne
Respondent: Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv00948
Petitioner: Curtis Anderson
Respondent: Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2010cv00446
Petitioner: Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent: State of Alabama, Attorney General of State of Alabama, The, Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanna v. Hetzel et al
as 5:2010cv00376
Petitioner: Rodney O'Neal Hanna
Respondent: Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Dorning et al
as 5:2010cv00385
Petitioner: James L. Butler, Sr.
Respondent: Blake L. Dorning and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?