Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 529
Farrow v. People of the State of Colorado, et al
as 23-1289
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL FARROW
Respondent / Appellee: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
In re: Burnham v. , et al
as 23-1264
Petitioner: ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent: WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
In re: Burnham v. , et al
as 23-1237
Petitioner: ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent: WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Lorbiecki v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1214
Petitioner / Appellant: GREGORY A. LORBIECKI
Respondent / Appellee: MARK FAIRBAIRN, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Spencer v. Burtlow, et al
as 23-1210
Petitioner / Appellant: TRACY SPENCER, a/k/a Jahad Ali
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN BURTLOW and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Phil Weiser
Santistevan v. Williams, et al
as 23-1193
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERTO F. SANTISTEVAN
Respondent / Appellee: DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director Colorado Department of Corrections and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
In re: Boles
as 23-1129
Petitioner: RUSSELL MARSHALL BOLES
Respondent: JEFF LONG, S.C.F. and PHILLIP WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Burnham v. Winden, et al
as 23-1097
Petitioner / Appellant: ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Santistevan v. Williams, et al
as 23-1053
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERTO F. SANTISTEVAN
Respondent / Appellee: DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director Colorado Department of Corrections and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Burnham v. Winden, et al
as 23-1040
Petitioner / Appellant: ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?