Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 121 - 130 of 803
Harold Montague v. Baker, et al
as 22-15722
Petitioner / Appellant: HAROLD E. MONTAGUE
Respondent / Appellee: MS. BAKER, STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Phillip King v. Perry Russell, et al
as 22-15720
Petitioner / Appellant: PHILLIP JAMES KING
Respondent / Appellee: PERRY RUSSELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Devon Cooper v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15708
Petitioner / Appellant: DEVON COOPER
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jeffery Wilson v. William Hutchings, et al
as 22-15684
Petitioner / Appellant: JEFFERY H. WILSON
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Gary Silva v. Russell, et al
as 22-15656
Petitioner / Appellant: GARY SILVA
Respondent / Appellee: RUSSELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brendan Nasby v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 22-15657
Petitioner / Appellant: BRENDAN NASBY
Respondent / Appellee: TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Vickie Duran v. Nevada, Division of Parole and Probation, et al
as 22-15613
Petitioner / Appellant: VICKIE LEAVITT DURAN
Respondent / Appellee: NEVADA, DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Bryan Dryden v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-15590
Petitioner / Appellant: BRYAN DRYDEN
Respondent / Appellee: CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Fernando Robles v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15591
Petitioner / Appellant: FERNANDO ROBLES
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and TIM GARRETT
Monte Burch v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 22-15572
Petitioner / Appellant: MONTE LEE BURCH
Respondent / Appellee: TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?