Cases 141 - 150 of 2,197
John Rosky v. Quentin Byrne, et al
as 22-16894
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN H. ROSKY
Respondent / Appellee:
QUENTIN BYRNE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Booker v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv02033
Petitioner:
David Booker
Respondent:
Joseph Lombardo and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anthony Anderson v. State of Nevada, et al
as 22-16856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY K. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Chavez-Juarez v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv00533
Petitioner:
Antonio Chavez-Juarez
Respondent:
Fernandeis Frazier and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Hearring v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-16836
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK HEARRING
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Whitener v. Garrett et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Petitioner:
Ace V Whitener
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rahim Muhammad v. Fernandies Frazier, et al
as 22-16825
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAHIM MUHAMMAD
Respondent / Appellee:
FERNANDIES FRAZIER, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and TIM GARRETT
Barao v. State of Nevada
as 2:2022cv01954
Petitioner:
Randy Barao
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Maki v. Renee Baker, et al
as 22-16784
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES J. MAKI
Respondent / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
John Marks v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-16768
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN JOEY MARKS
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
