Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al v. Internet Archive et al
as 1:2020cv04160
Plaintiff:
HarperCollins Publishers LLC, Hachette Book Group, Inc., Penguin Random House LLC and others
Defendant:
Internet Archive and Does 1 Through 5
Amicus Curiae:
Library Futures Institute, EveryLibrary Institute, and ReadersFirst, AMICI CURIAE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS, Michelle M Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Chronicle Books, LLC et al v. Audible, Inc.
as 1:2019cv07913
Plaintiff:
Chronicle Books, LLC, Harpercollins Publishers LLC, Hachette Book Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Audible, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
The Authors Guild, Inc. and Association of Authors' Representatives, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
In re: Literary Works in Elect
as 14-2550
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Authors Guild, Inc.
Appellant:
Emily M. Bass, Previously Served As Class Counsel
Defendant:
Reed Elsevier, Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive, LLC, DBA Factiva, Dialog Corporation and others
In re: Literary Works in Electronic Databases Copyright Litigation
as 1:2000md01379
Defendant:
Reed Elsevier , Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive, LLC , The Dialog Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The Authors Guild, Inc.
Objector:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Authors Guild, Inc. v. Hathitrust
as 12-4547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Authors Guild, Inc., Australian Society Of Authors Limited, Australian Society Of Authors Limited and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Hathitrust, Regents Of The University Of Michigan, Regents of the University of California and others
The Authors Guild, Inc. et al v. Hathitrust et al
as 1:2011cv06351
Plaintiff:
The Authors Guild, Inc. , The Australian Society Of Authors Limited , Union Des Ecrivaines Et Des Ecrivains Quebecois and others
Defendant:
Hathitrust, The Regents Of The University Of Michigan, The Regents of the University of California and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
