Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Underwood v. O-Reilly Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01766
Plaintiff:
Tyler Underwood
Defendant:
O-Reilly Auto Parts, Inc., Illinois Tool Works, Inc., The Blaster Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Archila v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
as 2:2021cv01475
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Archila
Defendant:
O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC and O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC doing business as O'Reilly Auto Parts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Omix Ada, Inc. v. Qingdao Hairunkaiyun Auto Parts Co., LTD. et al
as 2:2017cv02748
Defendant:
Qingdao Hairunkaiyun Auto Parts Co., Ltd. and Xianghe Baoliang Metal Products Co., Ltd
Plaintiff:
Omix Ada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
NOT USED
as 2:2017cv02747
Plaintiff:
Omix Ada, Inc.
Defendant:
Qingdao Hairunkaiyuan Auto Parts Co., LTD a/k/a Shangdong Kaiyuan vehickle Parts Co., LTD and Xianghe Baoliang Metal Products., Ltd., a/k/a Beijing Yunliang Shunda Trade Co., Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Omix Ada, Inc. v. Qingdao Hairunkaiyun Auto Parts Co., LTD. et al
as 2:2017cv02851
Defendant:
Qingdao Hairunkaiyun Auto Parts Co., Ltd. and Xianghe Baoliang Metal Products Co., Ltd
Plaintiff:
Omix Ada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Miranda v. Kragen Auto Parts
as 3:2010cv00578
Defendant:
Kragen Auto Parts
Plaintiff:
Luis Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
