Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Autoscores S.L. v. John et al
as 6:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Autoscores S.L.
Defendant:
Noah John and Deep Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Caplan v. GLOBAL AUTOMOTIVE INC. et al
as 1:2024cv20220
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
GLOBAL AUTOMOTIVE INC. and ROSMAN INVESTMENT LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Langley v. Bean Automotive, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv22952
Plaintiff:
Carragan Langley
Defendant:
Bean Automotive, Inc. and G.F.B. Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
McCagg v. Da Vinci Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Shellene McCagg
Defendant:
Da Vinci Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Brooks v. Prestige Automotive Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv61419
Plaintiff:
Andre Akona Brooks
Defendant:
Prestige Automotive Inc. doing business as The V Shop and Roger McIntyre
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Massive Transit Trasport, LLC v. Atlantic Coast Automotive, Inc.
as 0:2023cv61321
Plaintiff:
Massive Transit Trasport, LLC
Defendant:
Atlantic Coast Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Ayala v. APR Automotive, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jose J. Ayala, Jr.
Defendant:
APR Automotive, Inc. and APR Automotive, Inc. doing business as Reed Nissan Clermont
SHARPE v. FCA US LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHARPE
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, PANHANDLE AUTOMOTIVE INC, BAY CARS SOUTH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARIS v. MICHERY
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
CHOSTEN CARIS
Defendant:
DAVID MICHERY and MULLEN AUTOMOTIVE INC AND BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
